| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 |
1. Improving Risk/Reward in Wormholes (Idea thread) - in Wormholes [original thread]
Angsty Teenager wrote: Nobody runs sites with open statics so your idea is dumb and bad. Every single person with a PVE kill in wormholes completely disproves your statement.
- by Van Kuzco - at 2014.09.03 11:39:00
|
2. Improving Risk/Reward in Wormholes (Idea thread) - in Wormholes [original thread]
Everyone can post their ideas here for discussion. Idea: Add 1-3 waves to each sleeper site/signature. Possibly stronger ships that drop more valuable loot.
Result: Increased payouts for site runners
Site runners stay on grid longe...
- by Van Kuzco - at 2014.09.03 04:28:00
|
3. Frigate Hole IDs - in Wormholes [original thread]
What's the mass limit on these wormholes?
- by Van Kuzco - at 2014.08.26 20:51:00
|
4. An alternate suggestion to the "Mass-Based Spawn Distance"... - in Wormholes [original thread]
I dont think this is a good idea because it would make wormhole control impossible. You crit a hole and the enemy can still jump in an unlimited number of ships.
- by Van Kuzco - at 2014.08.19 20:00:00
|
5. sigs persisting over down time. - in Wormholes [original thread]
I love you.
- by Van Kuzco - at 2014.08.15 17:30:00
|
6. Is everyone manufacturing at a loss? (T2 Sentries) - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Termy Rockling wrote: f) make something profitable and wait with your bpcs, unless you reallyreally need that 13m. Yup. Unless that person is stopping manufacturing entirely there is really no point in just saving the BPCs or actually manufa...
- by Van Kuzco - at 2014.08.08 23:47:00
|
7. Is everyone manufacturing at a loss? (T2 Sentries) - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Team Bidders wrote: So, if you guys move out of Jita and set up a POS, you can save a lot of job installation cost and increase your profit. Also, Jarnis McOieksu is right about not adding invention cost for 2 reasons: 1. T2 BPCs which have b...
- by Van Kuzco - at 2014.08.08 20:10:00
|
8. Is everyone manufacturing at a loss? (T2 Sentries) - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Jarnis McPieksu wrote: Yes, these were calculated with no invention costs. Made a quick-and-dirty calc and about 1 million per BPC at 5-4-4 skills. BPC copy costs and invention job costs are trivially small. So reduce 1 million ISK from each "...
- by Van Kuzco - at 2014.08.08 08:10:00
|
9. Is everyone manufacturing at a loss? (T2 Sentries) - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Jarnis McPieksu wrote: This is with ME -10% component blueprints and self-built components / T1 parts, built in Jita. 10 unit run. No price set for BPC / datacores so slightly overstating profit margin. TLDR: Slim profits, I wouldn't build the...
- by Van Kuzco - at 2014.08.08 07:42:00
|
10. Sticky:Reserved #4 - in Wormholes [original thread]
Sith1s Spectre wrote: MicroNova wrote: One idea that would satisfy all of the stated goals could be a deployable module that facilitates collapsing wormholes. No - WH space doesn't need more risk free closing of wormholes. You want to ...
- by Van Kuzco - at 2014.08.08 05:22:00
|
11. Is everyone manufacturing at a loss? (T2 Sentries) - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Veinnail wrote: this is not only a drone issue, MANY builders are either A. producing and taking a loss B. selling the phantom stockpile C. relocated to lower index and facing lower throughput. I'm so confused why people would produce and ...
- by Van Kuzco - at 2014.08.08 05:14:00
|
12. Is everyone manufacturing at a loss? (T2 Sentries) - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Tau Cabalander wrote: I'm still selling pre-Crius sentries at a profit *shrug* I expect others are also selling from pre-Crius stockpiles. Yeah luckily I had quite a big stockpile as well. But I realized it was a bit pointless to produce mo...
- by Van Kuzco - at 2014.08.07 21:22:00
|
13. Is everyone manufacturing at a loss? (T2 Sentries) - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Due to the increased material cost (in quantity) and subsequent price drop for T2 Sentries, every single one is being produced/sold at a loss according to http://eve-industry.org/calc/. I also produce from a POS at a system with .01 cost index....
- by Van Kuzco - at 2014.08.07 19:01:00
|
14. post Crius - the true market impact of industry: Production Times - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Is there a way to see how manufacturing times were changed?
- by Van Kuzco - at 2014.08.06 06:26:00
|
15. Distance that you're being ejected out of a wormhole depends on ... - in Wormholes [original thread]
Aelyras Altol wrote: Van Kuzco wrote: Why not just invert the changes? Small things exit a WH further away and big things exit closer. This way kiting/shield cruiser fleets can actually be a viable meta. It would result in a much larger var...
- by Van Kuzco - at 2014.08.05 21:15:00
|
16. Rubicon - Fastest T1 Pod Carrier? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Barrogh Habalu wrote: Van Kuzco wrote: goes 4.9k with the mwd... This part hints me that OP isn't going to AFK autopilot the ship. If that's the case, overdrives are pointless, get inertia stabs instead. For non-hisec though I'd go with na...
- by Van Kuzco - at 2013.12.06 08:26:00
|
17. Rubicon - Fastest T1 Pod Carrier? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
With the warp speed changes I assume that interceptors are now the fastest way to get from one end of the system to another. What about T1 ships? Will a frigate with warp speed rigs outperform a shuttle? Here is my current ship: [Atron, speed] O...
- by Van Kuzco - at 2013.12.05 21:27:00
|
18. EFT v2.13.4 - Incursion 1.4.1 - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Bug: Unmentioned but the Drone Scope Chip Rig no longer incurs a stacking penalty with Omnidirectional Tracking Links. I am not sure if this was intended or not on behalf of the devs but I have confirmed it in game in 1.1.
- by Van Kuzco - at 2013.09.06 00:29:00
|
19. Drone scope chip with omnidir, not stacking penalized. - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Has anyone verified this on Tranquility now that 1.1 is live?
- by Van Kuzco - at 2013.09.03 11:58:00
|
20. Sticky:[Odyssey 1.1] Heavy Assault Cruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Excited for the changes! The Ishtar seriously needs a CPU boost though or a reduction to CPU of drone mods.
- by Van Kuzco - at 2013.07.18 14:49:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |